23.2.2005
Address by Dr Dimitrij Rupel, Chairman-in-Office of the OSCE
to the Committee of Ministers' Deputies of the Council of Europe
Strasbourg, France
Ladies and Gentlemen,
It is an honor to address this meeting of the Committee of Ministers'
Deputies of the Council of Europe in my capacity as Chairman-in-Office
of the OSCE.
I would like to take this opportunity today to lay out some points
of special importance for both organisations and to point out some
specific regional questions.
In 2005, special attention will be paid to strengthening and streamlining
our relations with the Council of Europe. As you are well aware,
our two organisations carry out similar activities in some areas,
particularly in the human dimension. This is not necessarily a bad
thing. Complementarity can be healthy as long as we do not waste
resources, provoke forum shopping, or step on each other's toes
in the field.
There are plenty of challenges for us to address in the human dimension,
the fight against terrorism and trafficking in human beings, to
name but a few of areas of overlap.
In my opinion, co-operation should be strengthened in particular
in:
- promoting the implementation of international standards and commitments
on democratic elections;
- combating intolerance and discrimination;
- addressing the issue of human rights and terrorism; and
- in the fields of the rule of law as well as freedom of media and
information.
As you may know I also appointed three Personal Representatives
as part of our overall fight against intolerance and discrimination
to address this issue on the highest political level among the whole
OSCE region.
The two organisations have comparative advantages and distinctive
sets of commitments, which could be used to reinforce and support
each other's efforts, and deliver better results. CoE's norm-setting
commitments strengthen and intensify OSCE's political and operational
activities. But there are also differences between the two organizations
like i.e. geopolitical dimension (America, Asia).
The flexibility of the OSCE decision making may open the doors
to the Council of Europe for setting legal standards. For example
the OSCE discussion in the beginning of 1990s on national minorities
indirectly influenced the Council of Europe to start drafting Framework
Convention for the Protection of National Minorities.
Another issue that needs to be addressed more effectively in Europe
is the issue of migration and integration.
That is what I have just done with my Polish counterpart and the
two Secretaries General of the OSCE and Council of Europe. It was
evident that both organisations have an important contribution to
the process of consolidating security and prosperity across the
continent. The magnitude and scope of the needs of member states
is such that there are little grounds for worrying about having
too many cooks in the kitchen.
However, there is room for improvement in the way that we work,
and in our co-ordination. The onus is on us, the States involved,
to provide the necessary guidance. That is why I welcome the creation
of the OSCE/CoE Co-ordination Group on enhanced co-operation. I
expect the Group to look at the operational activities of the two
organizations and to come up with some concrete ideas and proposals
for improved interaction and better spending of the limited resources.
The idea of more joint activities is something that I believe the
Co-ordination Group should pay special attention to.
OSCE-Council of Europe co-operation will be on the agenda of the
Summit of the Council of Europe in May 2005. I support the elaboration
of a political document on OSCE/CoE co-operation, which should be
pragmatic, substantive and result-oriented.
I am looking forward to the joint meeting of the OSCE Permanent
Council and the Committee of Ministers of the CoE. Our organisations
might have differing mandates, institutional structures and working
methods but we share a commitment to the same values and a dedication
to the same goals. I believe that we should give a new impetus to
complementarity and co-operation on issues and areas of common interest.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Allow me to identify a number of areas where the OSCE is active
that may be of interest to the Council of Europe. There are a number
of country-specific and regional issues that Slovenia's Chairmanship
is looking at with special interest.
We have no magic solutions, but we feel that targeted and pragmatic
steps can contribute to thawing frozen conflicts, consolidating
peace-building processes, and supporting democratization.
Ukraine is important for the OSCE. Our joint election reporting
was crucial in highlighting irregularities that forced a run-off
of the second round of the Presidential elections.
As I said during my visit to Ukraine in early January, I believe
that the OSCE and Ukraine have a good opportunity to strengthen
co-operation across a range of issues including freedom of the media,
the economic and environmental, political-military dimensions and
regional security. This opportunity should not be missed.
Another priority for Slovenia's Chairmanship in 2005 will be to
consolidate work that has been done in the Balkans. The OSCE will
take advantage of its regional coverage, and promote solutions to
issues with regional significance.
Kosovo will be a major issue in 2005. The OSCE is one of the key
players in Kosovo. OMiK is by far our biggest mission. We spend
more than 20% of our budget there. As a result, it is clear that
the OSCE should be actively involved in the standards review process
and any re-structuring of the international presence in Kosovo.
In Serbia and Montenegro, the conditions are set for a continued
good co-operation between our two Organisations in areas such as
legal and judicial reform, protection of human rights, and media
development.
In the countries of the Caucasus the OSCE is actively promoting
democratic changes, in particular constitutional reform, amendments
to electoral systems, local governance reform, freedom of assembly
principles and strengthening of media freedom.
In 2005 I would like to focus activities in Central Asia on a number
of issues: migration, human rights education, and border management
and security, including de-mining. I also believe that we should
deepen our efforts to assist the governments in their democratization
processes, particularly in relation to elections. I have appointed
Mr. Alojz Peterle as my Personal Representative for the participating
States of Central Asia, who will assist me at the highest political
level in identifying areas for co-operation.
I see some grounds for optimism with regard to the OSCE's engagement
in conflict settlement activities in the region. The OSCE has long
been involved in seeking a solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
and will re-double its efforts this year to help thaw this frozen
conflict.
In Georgia, the Georgian-Ossetian conflict remains high on our
agenda. We will continue to support de-militarization efforts agreed
by the parties and to facilitate the political process and to support
de-militarization as agreed by the parties. The OSCE welcomes the
support rendered by the Venice Commission to the Georgian Government
in elaborating concrete status proposals for South Ossetia, as this
could move the process of political negotiations forward. In Abkhazia
we continue to support the UN-led settlement process. Like others,
I regret that the mandate of the Border Monitoring Operation was
not extended. I know that Georgia would like to have international
assistance in order to improve their capacity and capability for
efficient border management and border security. We should be receptive
to their call.
In Moldova, the challenge this year is to get the process of dialogue
back on track. The OSCE will be monitoring the elections on 6 March,
and we look forward to moving the settlement process forward soon
after.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
In 2004 Slovenia was an active supporter of deepening OSCE partnership
with the Mediterranean and Asian Partners for Co-operation. I believe
that we should build on last year's positive experience in Afghanistan
and consider ways of practically co-operating with our Partners,
including the newest Partner for Co-operation, Mongolia. I support
the initiative of my predecessor to request the Secretariat and
ODIHR to send a training needs assessment team to the Palestinian
territories. I believe that such targeted operations that make OSCE
expertise available to others are in the interests of us all.
Our work does not take place in a vacuum. Just as the OSCE is evolving,
so too are other organizations and the world in which we must all
work. Slovenia attaches importance to working with international
organizations and institutions as well as with civil society in
order to make most effective use of our respective strengths and
capabilities.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Thank you for your attention.
Celotno besedilo govora si lahko preberete tudi tukaj:
English:
(38 kB )

|