18.5.2005
Address
by Dr. Dimitrij Rupel, the OSCE Chairman-in-Office at the Ministry
of Foreign Affairs of Canada
Ottawa, Canada
Deputy Minister,
Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,
It is a pleasure to be here and an honour to address this prestigious
audience as the OSCE Chairman in Office. I find visits to this side
of the Atlantic always most inspiring and I look forward to our
discussion today.
Sixty years ago the bloody battles of the Second World War came
to an end. The world breathed a sigh of relief as the men and women
form many countries including many brave Canadians began returning
home.
But Europe, which had been divided by war, soon became divided
by the Cold War.
The Cold War thawed briefly, thirty years ago, when 35 heads of
States and government, including your former Prime Minister Trudeau,
met in Helsinki to sign the historic Final Act. That Act set in
motion a process of détente between East and West and forged an
important link between human rights and security - two developments
that were crucial in eroding the Iron Curtain and re-uniting Europe.
This was acknowledged fifteen years ago with the Charter of Paris
for a New Europe. Amidst the euphoria of historic changes, OSCE
heads of state mapped out a vision for a Europe whole and free.
With the end of the Cold War some people felt that the CSCE was
no longer needed. Its aim had been to build security in Europe
through co-operation, and that had been achieved.
But, as it turned out, post-communist transition had to be supported.
Conflict prevention needed to be strengthened, democratization had
to be encouraged.
The CSCE process was therefore transformed into an organization
with field operations, institutions, and permanent consultative
and decision-making bodies.
These changes helped to make Europe a safer place over the past
fifteen years. The OSCE has helped to keep the lid on simmering
conflicts in places like Transdniestria, South Ossetia and Nagorno-Karabakh.
It has worked to prevent conflicts, particularly those involving
inter-ethnic tensions. It has helped to resolve conflicts in Tajikistan
and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. And it has played
an important role in post conflict peace building, for example in
the Balkans.
It has become a leader in election monitoring, for example in Ukraine
last December when more than one thousand OSCE monitors - including
a large number of Canadians - helped to restore confidence in the
electoral process there.
The OSCE is dealing with new threats and challenges to security
like counter-terrorism, anti-trafficking, border monitoring, and
policing. Indeed, we would welcome more police experts from Canada.
We are also paying special attention to promoting tolerance and
non-discrimination. Canada, with its long tradition of multi-cultural
integration and tolerance, could be a leader in the OSCEs work
in this field.
In short, the OSCE is not a Cold War relic or a post-Cold War product
that has passed its expiry date. It is a thoroughly modern organization,
well-equipped and well-positioned to deal with contemporary threats
and challenges.
It believes in multi-lateral approaches to complex issues of common
concern. And it believes that security is measured in more than
tanks and guns - security relates to human rights and democracy,
economic and environmental issues, as well as political-military
aspects of security. It is my impression that this is a vision that
closely corresponds to how Canada looks at the world.
What is not so clear is whether all participating States still
share the same vision of a democratic European security space united
by common values. Lately, the OSCE has been the focus of considerable
attention at a high political level. The Russian Federation and
some of its partners in the Commonwealth of Independent States have
questioned the relevance and strategic future of the Organization.
It has been criticized for applying double standards and for losing
its focus. Others have called for strengthening the effectiveness
of the OSCE.
Like the UN, NATO and others, the OSCE needs to change with the
times in order to maintain its usefulness. I have therefore outlined
a "Triple R" agenda for Slovenias Chairmanship based
on Reforming, Rebalancing and Revitalizing the OSCE. I have also
appointed a Panel of Eminent Persons whose report on reforming the
OSCE is expected this June, and there will be high level consultations
on reform in the autumn.
And yet, as this discussion goes on the OSCE continues to prove
its worth and relevance. In Kyrgyzstan the OSCE is playing a lead
role in supporting democratic transition. We are keeping an eye
on developments in Uzbekistan and the Fergana valley.
The OSCE is also a central forum for high level political dialogue
on the future of European security. As the European Unions new
neighborhood comes closer to Russias near abroad, developments
in countries like Georgia, Moldova, Belarus, and Ukraine take on
a new significance. Similarly Central Asia is now on the map, due
to developments in Afghanistan and Iraq, the search for new energy
sources, and the growing interest in Eurasian geo-strategic position.
The OSCE, with its membership stretching from Vancouver to Vladivostock,
is a big tent under which all states can meet as equals to talk
about issues of common concern and common interest. We should not
underestimate the importance of such dialogue.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Canada is one of the OSCEs biggest contributors. And yet you are
not part of Europe. You may therefore ask, whats in it for us?
Do we get good value for money?
In the modern world, security is indivisible. Crises in one part
of the world can have a knock-on effects in others. For example
violent conflict can lead to loss of life, deployment of peace keepers,
refugees, and then expensive post conflict rehabilitation. As the
saying goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. If
we put more resources into preventing conflicts and building stable,
democratic societies, the chance of conflict will be reduced. Through
the OSCE, Canadians are contributing that ounce of prevention. And
we are grateful.
I believe that the OSCE can do more to share its experience with
other regions of the world. And here Canadas links to the Pacific
and its deep engagement in Afghanistan could be used to the full.
I urge you to continue your active engagement through supporting
projects, seconding staff, and providing ideas and expertise to
promote security and co-operation in Europe.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
The project of integration and reconciliation of the European continent
and beyond, of East and West, of former adversaries remains extremely
important. The work of the OSCE and other international organizations
is far from over. Developments all over the world show that long
term economic, social and political stability depend on open society,
good governance, freedom of expression, democracy, transparency
and competition.
Dramatic changes that have been made in the past few years need
to be buttressed. We should not be complacent, for example about
parts of the Balkans. Without continued, steady engagement all of
our careful work may unravel - at a high price. Nor should we turn
our backs on those who are asking for assistance in the process
of democratization. The OSCE - its values and instruments - need
to be constantly supported. And this requires the political engagement
and will of all of its States.
In conclusion,
Deputy Minister, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen
This year we mark a number of anniversaries that enable us to put
into perspective events that have shaped the world in the past sixty
years. We recall the end of the Second World War and should resolve
never to allow such horrors to be repeated. We recall the thirtieth
anniversary of the Helsinki Final Act and the impact that it had
on uniting a divided continent. And we recall the fifteenth anniversary
of the Charter of Paris that set out a vision for a New Europe.
We can only speculate what future generations will think about
2005. They may see it as the second wave of revolutions. They may
see it as a turning point in the reform of inter-governmental institutions.
They may see it as a defining moment in the development of the European
project, and how this affects the EUs relations with Russia and
the United States.
Whatever the perspective of hindsight, they will recall that this
was a dynamic period of change. And the OSCE is right in the middle
of it.
Slovenia and Canada, like all other OSCE States, can play a role
in finding effective ways for pooling ideas and resources designed
to promote peace and security. We all have a common interest in
this project, and have a better chance of fulfilling our objectives
if we work together.
Thank you for your attention.
Celotno besedilo izjave si lahko preberete tudi tukaj:
-
English: (41 kB )

|